The mechanics of a Poleshift

Re: ENTIRE PLANET ROCKED BY SEISMIC ACTIVITY - WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
Message Board posting from Godlike Productions http://www.godlikeproductions.com/

On the subject of Pole Shifts and crustal movements.

I did some calculations for crustal movements, it can not be very fast. There is another site that says that the crust will relocate in a 24 hour period. That would raise the temperature (through friction and the need for energy to break the momentum of the rotational velocity of just the crust, etc) over 2,000 degrees C - that would be enough to cause all the water in and on the world to vaporize, and would melt the crust.

However, playing with the figures the fastest that the earth´s crust could relocate (acceleration here) would be .5 mps (meter per second) in a minimal movement laterally to the rotation of the earth (which is to say north or south) The temperature released would raise the ambient temperature of the air to 140 degrees F (assuming the average temperature of the planet is 68 degrees F) This would be a constant release of heat, tapering off as the rotational velocity is nulled slightly (remember a body in motion tends to stay in motion)

I have done further calculations, which show that the ambient temperature (world wide) could be within life bearing limits (120 F tops) if the polar ice caps could absorb some of the excess heat. This would have to be over a long period of time (30 days) This is an AVERAGE. Places on earth could see 200 degrees while others would see lower temperatures (at first). This is a very limited movement, placing the north pole near the Arctic circle. Not a big movement per se, but big enough to wreck havoc on the worlds climate for centuries.

The initial start of movement would have to be very small, reaching a peak, then tapering off. Why? well any sudden acceleration/deceleration would kill us. Imagine a jar of strawberry jelly dropped and smashing. The acceleration can not exceed .5 m/s and life still exist. Even this small of an acceleration (north or south of the direction of spin) would result in cataclysm flooding as the world´s oceans continue traveling in their present trajectory. This is to say that the oceans would continue on their easterly direction as the land moves in a north or south easterly direction. at 5 m/s we are looking at all low lying areas being flooded (possibly up to 800 to 1000 feet, depending on currents, and present tides for long periods, higher altitudes being washed over at least once depending on the angle of movement to the rotation of the earth)

What does that all mean?

It means that in order for a crustal slip to take place and life continue to exist (without being flooded and or broiled) the movement of the crust can not accelerate faster than .01 meters per second or 3.2808 Feet per second (39.3701 Inches per second) Assuming that the atmosphere has a lag to catch up to any movement the crust makes, we would have to limit the velocity to around 150 MPH (hurricane velocities). Of course, over time the atmosphere would take on the velocity of the crust in the direction that the crust moves.

What develops is a picture of a crustal movement that starts out slowly, very slowly, taking a considerable amount of time to pick up speed (velocity) with friction between the rotational velocity of the mantel and the perpendicular velocity of the crust to act as a break mechanism. The farthest the crust could possibly move is 5000 miles to the north or south. That is nearly 1/5th of the planets circumference (mean)

The fastest that could take place is over a period of 45 days and life could continue to exist. The notion of the earth stopping in 24 hours is false, the heat generated by such a fast deceleration would melt the crust totally. (assuming a stoppage of either the crust or core in relation to the other) Even if the planetary body of earth stopped, the atmosphere and water would continue in the same direction. Can we say global flood? Assuming that the earth is preparing for a crustal slip of this magnitude, we would see increased earth quake activity over decades (All those who have a record of quakes can see this taking place over decades, with the increase rising as the movement takes place)

Initial acceleration would be centimeters per year, picking up slowly over a period of decades causing the barrier between the mantel and crust to liquefy to a high viscosity, releasing more heat which could reach the surface of the crust as a 1 to 2 degree (F) temperature rise. The super liquefied layer between mantel and crust would act like a lubricant which would allow additional crustal acceleration. Reaching a breaking point at 50 decades (+/-) when the acceleration would jump to .1 mps for a 41 to 45 day period. (This is an average acceleration - the actual acceleration would be time related, being higher at its peak and lower at the start and finish of the crustal movement.) Other signs of the impending crustal movement would be:

1. Increased heating of the oceans (all that heat produced from the friction between mantel and crust rises, oceans cover the majority of the surface of earth, thus would heat up more than air. Water is more conductive than air) This would initially take decades, appearing normal at first. Ever wonder why El Nino seems to be getting worse and stronger and more frequent? Its because the oceans are heating up. Scientists are stumped why this is so.

2. Increased fault slippage, the heat would cause expansion, which would at first affect fault lines, which would result in more earth quakes, with an increasing number and severity as the heat increases beneath the crust. Certain places where the crust is the thinnest would ´bulge´ the increased heat causing expansion of the affected layer between crust and mantel. Since the mantel is compressed as much as it can be, the natural direction of expansion is upward, or through the crust.

3. Increased volcanic activity. That heat and expansion causing old dormant volcanoes to have a renewed energy source, also the expansion of the crust would cause a weakening of the crust, opening new vents.

4. Rotational wobble. The Crust presents the earth with an unbalanced distribution of weight, even a small (10 centimeters) displacement of the crust would cause the earth to wobble more (which ironically could induce more crustal displacement, thus causing more wobble, thus causing more displacement, etc.) Added bulges from the expansion beneath the crust would worsen the imbalance.

5. Since the line of momentum is rotational (for the most part) we would see a decrease in the planet´s rotation, (slight) which would cause a few leap seconds over a 100 years of time or so. That rotational momentum is being redirected into a perpendicular momentum, causing increased heat (remember, energy is conserved, if it is removed from one aspect, it shows up in another aspect.) That slowing affect will increase as the crust slippage takes place. To make up for the perpendicular movement, the rotational velocity will slow. After the movement takes place, the rotational velocity will increase. The loss of energy through heat will equate to a slightly slower rotation of post slippage to pre-slippage. This may account for a large loss of rotational velocity through the millions of years. Instead of being a constant gradual loss it is a constant loss with spikes of greater losses.

6. Weakening of magnetic lines of force. Though the earth´s core produces the magnetic flux, the crust and mantel interact with that flux field.

7. Possible relocation of the ozone, or even destruction of upper atmospheric ozone. This would be due to the magnetic flux field weakening, causing the ionize oxygen to polarize and move away from the strongest points of magnetic force (poles).

8. Migration of animals from tropics to northern regions. Especially those in the oceans since the mean average temperature of the ocean would increase.

The build up to the big event would start out slowly. Look at the earth as a huge gyroscope. any one who has played with a gyro scope knows that the gyroscope tends to want to remain in its place. Any force that tries to move it is met with resistance, that resistance, in this case, is internal and will cause heat. More resistance to the rotational momentum would take a long period of time to reach the critical breaking point. With the imbalance of the crust, it would require a few decades to reach that moment.

The earth is naturally resistant to any movements from its rotational direction. however, once the process is started, it will increase due to the natural imbalance of the crustal mass. We can assume that the crust slip is part and parcel of plate tectonics. We all know that the Continental plates move in relation of one another. This is a slow process, however it is a continual process which will eventually knock the earth out of sync with its rotation leading to a massive crustal slippage every so often.

You are looking for an external source (planet X) to an internal problem which is caused by the naturally occurring tectonic movements of the earth. The safest place on earth is off of earth. Not on some other planet, but in orbit during this crust slip. With a maximum time for any slippage (due to friction) anyone could live in orbit during that period.

Another ´safe´ place, not as safe as being off earth, would be any geologically stable area on earth that is above the 500 elevation mark. Such areas would be any place that are solid rock. Montana is one such place. Being underground would be safer than being on the surface considering the high winds and the enviable acid rain (from volcanic gasses) and from monster storms caused by the sudden release of moisture through heating of the oceans.

Look at the development of the ´concentration´ camps and the underground bunkers. Compare the geologic stability and altitude of the areas a certain pattern will emerge early. The initial build up to a crustal slip would take decades, possibly even a century. It would be a gradual process, appearing to be a ´normal´ change of state at first.

We could assume that since seismology is a new science (mind the 1906 earth quake was estimated, not recorded) and that seismographs are a rather new kid on the block, that it isn´t until most recently that scientists have ´discovered´ the problem with earth.

Through out the past 50 decades we know that the number and severity of earth quakes have been on the rise. We can also show a rise in the mean temperature of the earth and other tail tell signs which have, until most recently, been thought of as the normal ebb and flow of the earth.

The red herring of Global Warming may have lead many down the wrong road. This is not to say that Global warming is not playing a factor in the climatological events we are witnessing. However, the estimates of carbons to climate change have shown that climate change is going faster than the calculations have shown.

Again, this is not being caused by outside forces, it is the result of plate tectonics and the natural imbalance of the earth. All one has to do is look at a globe of the earth and we see that there is a Land Hemisphere and a Water hemisphere. This is not to say that there is no Planet X. Planet X may be very real, however, it is way to far away to have any impact on the movements of the Earth at this time.

All of my calculations were averaged out and rounded off. Anyone can figure these things out if they used the estimated mass of the crust to the estimated total mass of the earth, and if they know how to calculate energy from acceleration.