|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Quick Links |
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
THAT OLD NIBURU/PLANET X JUST
KEEPS ON A'COMIN Posted By: PuzzlePieces The
following is a 'translation'. Bear with it...very interesting. CHAMELEON
Part
I. Everything
signalize intensively that in our Solar system is moving something huge,
something, what according to our science, should not exist at all. Or, is it
the other way? Does our science know everything what needs to know, but it is
so tied by conventions that it could not relate and interpret properly all
information it has? I do not think so. It looks more that someone is keeping
something well under wraps. Almost
a year, I am collecting and publishing specific information, which are undoubtedly
closely related. At the beginning it was likely intuition developed by long
time collecting of bits and pieces of information. From the attack on USA, I
felt on uncommon ground. Not because of emotions or politics, but I am
somehow attracted to "big things" which at the first look appears
to have no logic. However, the first look usually deceives, since everything
is always related to everything else. From
some time ago is almost openly discussed that cosmic space is littered with
large amount of ruins of heavenly bodies. If we omit cosmic dust leading to
"meteoritic showers", there are meteoroids from the size of tennis
ball up to asteroids big like Texas. Lately, a deserved attention is paid to
objects close to Earth or objects what may cross our orbit. These objects
called NEOS (Near Earth Objects) are divided into groups based on their
danger to life on Earth. Countries like Great Britain established commissions
of specialists developing scenarios how to act in such cases [See BBC Online
| SCI/TECH | Monday, 18 September, 2000]. There is also other interest,
concentrated in the hands of one large, well known institution. To filter and
suppress information to avoid global panic, if cosmic event could endanger
life on Earth. A
few days ago, I have read an interesting article of David Icke. Except a few
different views, there was nothing new. However, the reading triggered new
ideas. When
I wrote many years ago a book titled "UFO´s, Bible and End of the
World", I was fascinated what knowledge was Zacharia Sitchin able to
pull from texts on Sumerian tablets. His work influenced me strongly, what
knows everyone who have read any of my books. The cosmogony he introduced I
accepted readily, it was the best I knew and it became the basis of my future
ways of thinking. However, over time I saw some of his connections more valid
than some others, and some of his thoughts I discarded completely. I went
different way, as is presented in "Abyss of Return". Anyway,
whatever way I was looking at it, in the back of my head was lurking fuzzy
recollection of some ancient global catastrophe. The last we know about is
Biblical Flood. Icke is also quoting Sitchin and for his "Planet X"
scenario is using the same indications and affirmations, dressed by many
shrouded hints. However, he is still missing something important. Few
months ago I started to write thoughts about "Cosmic Serpent",
first part is on the web. However, second part is giving me hard time; it
feels like I am missing something important too. I feel forced to reconsider
core meaning of "nibiru" and look also for relations in graphs of
ELFRAD, in records of Kuiper belt bodies, in astronomy and calculations of Mayas,
in tables by Dmitriev and Coterell, etc. It still does not fit; something
important is still missing somewhere. It appears to me that the concept of
"nibiru & crossing" is not representing just one specific
cosmic body, but something like a cyclical event of bigger proportion. At
the beginning of July, under the title "Huge New World", I
presented pages about an exciting astronomical discovery known as 2001KX76.
This newly discovered body, specified by astronomers as (KBO - Kuiper Belt
Object), was originally described as a reddish object a bit smaller than
Pluto. Wow! It was like a gift to my 50th birthday. I tried to get more
details on it, however, on server of Lowell Observatory was nothing about it,
equally on NSF, and so on. Our new "Huge World" suddenly
disappeared. Not from the sky, but from the official news, no seems to be
interested! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For
National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) to mention the discovery, it
took a week after BBC presented Page with this text: Kuiper
Belt Object Found Possibly As Large As Pluto's Moon Astronomers
from Lowell Observatory, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the
Large Binocular Telescope Observatory have discovered an icy planetary body
orbiting the Sun beyond Neptune in the Kuiper Belt roughly equal in size to
Pluto’s moon Charon. "This
object is intrinsically the brightest Kuiper Belt Object found so far,"
says Lowell Observatory Director Robert Millis, leader of the survey team.
"The exact diameter of 2001 KX76 depends on assumptions that astronomers
make about how its brightness relates to its size. Traditional assumptions
make it the biggest by a significant amount, while others make it larger by
at least 5 percent." Assuming
a reflectivity (or albedo) of 4 percent, 2001 KX76 would have a diameter of
approximately 1,270 kilometers (788 miles), bigger than Ceres, the largest
known asteroid. For comparison, Pluto’s moon Charon has an estimated diameter
of 1,200 kilometers (744 miles). Earlier
this year, a Kuiper Belt Object (KBO) called "2000 Varuna" was
announced with an estimated diameter of 900 kilometers, based on a calculated
reflectivity of 7 percent. Applying this albedo to 2001 KX76 gives it a
diameter of roughly 960 kilometers (595 miles). 2001
KX76 was discovered in the course of the Deep Ecliptic Survey, a NASA-funded
search for KBOs being conducted by the Lowell-MIT-LBT team using the National
Science Foundation’s telescopes at Kitt Peak National Observatory near
Tucson, AZ, and Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. The team
spotted 2001 KX76 in deep digital images of the southern sky taken with the
4-meter Blanco Telescope at Cerro Tololo on May 22 by James L. Elliot of MIT
and Lawrence H. Wasserman of Lowell Observatory. 2001
KX76 is currently at a distance of just over 6.4 billion kilometers (4
billion miles) from the Sun. Its orbit is inclined by approximately 20
degrees with respect to the orbital plane of the major planets, but the detailed
shape of its orbit remains uncertain. Available evidence suggests that the
newly discovered KBO may be in an orbital resonance with Neptune, orbiting
the Sun three times for each time that Neptune completes four orbits. The
brightness and colors of 2001 KX76 have been measured by Elliot, Susan Kern,
and David Osip, all of MIT, with the Raymond and Beverly Sackler Magellan
Instant Camera (MagIC) on the 6.5-meter Magellan Telescope at Las Campanas
Observatory in Chile. The object has a distinctly reddish color typical of
many primitive bodies in the outer Solar System. "2001
KX76 is so exciting because it demonstrates that significant bodies remain to
be discovered in the Kuiper Belt," Millis explains. "We have every
reason to believe that objects ranging up to planets as large or larger than
Pluto are out there waiting to be found. Until the Kuiper Belt has been
thoroughly explored, we cannot pretend to know the extent or the content of
the Solar System." The
existence of the Kuiper Belt was postulated by J. A. Fernandez and by M.
Duncan, T. Quinn, and S. Tremaine in the 1980s to explain the origin of
short-period comets. These comets move around the Sun in the same direction
as the planets, and are found in orbits that are tipped only modestly with
respect to the ecliptic plane. These researchers showed that short-period
comets could not have originated from the more distant spherical Oort Comet
Cloud as originally believed. They predicted that a second, more flattened
reservoir of "proto-comets" must lie beyond the orbit of Neptune. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The
first Kuiper Belt Object was found in 1992 by David Jewitt and Jane Luu of
the University of Hawaii. Since then, astronomers have found over 400 KBOs,
but tens of thousands likely remain to be discovered. These objects are
believed to be remnants from the formation of the Solar System, and
consequently are among the most primitive and least-evolved objects available
for study by planetary astronomers. About
one-quarter of the known KBOs have been found by the Deep Ecliptic Survey
Team. Other members of the team are Marc Buie of Lowell and Mark Wagner of
the Large Binocular Telescope Observatory on Mount Graham, AZ. The Deep
Ecliptic Survey was recently awarded formal survey status at the National
Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO), assuring that this reconnaissance of
the outer Solar System will continue for the next three years. Much
more precise measurement of KBO diameters will be possible with NASA's
upcoming Space Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF) mission, due for launch in
2002. Kitt
Peak and Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory are part of NOAO, which is
operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA),
Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. The
survey team’s research is supported by the NASA Planetary Astronomy Program
through grants to Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ, and MIT in Cambridge,
MA. [NOTE:
Robert Millis, James Elliot, and Lawrence Wasserman can be reached at (928)
774-3358 or via e-mail at rlm@lowell.edu,
jle@MIT.edu, and lhw@lowell.edu.] For
more information: Douglas
Isbell Dolores
Beasley NOAO
is operated by the Association of Universities for Research --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well,
it appears to me that this "new" KBO 2001 KX76 may be with a great
possibility the same object what IRAS discovered back in 1983. At that time
the discovered object was classified as a very distant "red dwarf"
(red dwarfs are weak stars, somehow too cold to be stars and too heavy to be
a planet. Due to their temperature, they emit weak red light in limited
spectra; they have high density, strong gravitation, and their atmosphere
appear like a foggy red veil). Back in 1983 was even some talk about
"distant galaxy"… There
are other peculiarities related to KBO 2001 KX76. This "new" object
was actually discovered April 4. 2001 at 03:06:45 UTC and described as
"object emitting diffused light estimated at magnitude 11".
Coordinates +/- 20" (that's about 0.006), RA a +/- 10" (0.003) Dec:
RA 05° 09´ 09", Dec +16° 31´ 49"; RA 5.1525, Dec +16.5303 However,
there is more to it... The
same object was discovered on February 07.2001 at 23:30"32 UTC by
Neuchatel Observatory in Switzerland. Excited discoverers published the news
immediately, but a week later recalled their discovery and denied its
authenticity. Strangely, they reestablished authenticity of their discovery
right AFTER the object was "discovered" again by astronomers in
Chile AND Arizona. What
is its real color? What is it, actually? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr
Alexey N. Dmitriev notes that … Current
PlanetoPhysical alterations of the Earth are becoming irreversible. Strong
evidence exists that these transformations are being caused by highly charged
material and energetic non-uniformity's in anisotropic interstellar space
which have broken into the interplanetary area of our Solar System. This
"donation" of energy is producing hybrid processes and excited
energy states in all planets, as well as the Sun. We
will list the recent large-scale events in the Solar System in order to fully
understand, and comprehend, the PlanetoPhysical transformations taking place.
This development of events, as it has become clear in the last few years, is
being caused by material and energetic non-uniformity's in anisotropic
interstellar space. In its travel through interstellar space, the Heliosphere
travels in the direction of the Solar Apex in the Hercules Constellation. On
its way it has met (1960's) non-homogeneities of matter and energy containing
ions of Hydrogen, Helium, and Hydroxyl in addition to other elements and
combinations. This kind of interstellar space dispersed plasma is presented
by magnetized strip structures and striations. The Heliosphere [solar system]
transition through this structure has led to an increase of the shock wave in
front of the Solar System from 3 to 4 AU, to 40 AU, or more. This shock wave
thickening has caused the formation of a collusive plasma in a parietal
layer, which has led to a plasma overdraft around the Solar System, and then
to its breakthrough into interplanetary domains. This breakthrough
constitutes a kind of matter and energy donation made by interplanetary space
to our Solar System. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Events
cited in Dmitrijev´s text is possible to explain by evidently stronger
presence (from 1960) of interwoven electromagnetic powers of two related
heliosphers, that which ecliptic planes may cross even in obtuse angle. If,
on the edges of Chameleon influence, are present bodies similar to Uran or
Neptune, then is possible to explain origin and weird behavior of large
objects in Kuiper belt. Simply, imagine that two huge tilted carousels are
periodically coming for closer pass to each other. This
above described potentiality is not contradictory to Sumerian cosmogony, or
to Biblical Genesis. In my view, here lays the magic of duality of Mayas
renderings. The trunk of "Tree of Life" is the axis of ideal
balance and the allegories on both sides symbolize two possible extremes. The
same is valid for a human form being a part of the same system; either
adapting or resisting changes in the surrounding environment. At
the beginning of Dmitriev report is few very important thoughts: Therefore
the current period of transformation is transient, and the transition of
life's representatives to the future may take place only after a deep
evaluation of what it will take to comply with these new Earthly biospheric
conditions. Each living representative on Earth will be getting a thorough
"examination," or "quality control inspection," to
determine it's ability to comply with these new conditions. These
evolutionary challenges always require effort, or endurance, be it individual
organisms, species, or communities. Therefore, it is not only the climate
that is becoming new, but we as human beings are experiencing a global change
in the vital processes of living organisms, or life itself; which is yet
another link in the total process. We cannot treat such things separately, or
individually. Emphasis
of the above is again at the end of his report: Our
Planet Earth is now in the process of a dramatic transformation;by altering
the electromagnetic skeleton through a shift of the geomagnetic field poles,
and through compositional changes in the ozone, and hydrogen, saturation
levels of its gas-plasma envelopes. These changes in the Earth's physical
state are being accompanied by resultant climatic/atmospheric, and
biospheric, adaptation processes. These processes are becoming more and more
intense, and frequent, as evidenced by the real time increase in
"non-periodic transient events"; ie., catastrophes. There are
reasons favoring, or pointing to, the fact that a growth in the ethical, or
spiritual quality, of humanity would decrease the number and intensity of
complex catastrophes. It has become vitally important that a world chart be
prepared setting forth the favorable, and the catastrophic, regions on Earth
taking into account the quality of the geologic-geophysical environment, the
variety and intensity of cosmic influences, and the real level of
spiritual-ethical development of the people occupying those areas. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here
is a reasonable point - the development of humanity may either increase or
decrease in direct relation to the number of catastrophes experienced.
Important role in development of future civilization would depend not only on
the number of survivors, but also on the ethical, intellectual and spiritual
qualities of the survivors. If mostly poets survived, their civilization
would be different than when if mostly criminals would be fathers of the new
civilization. Perhaps, somebody knowledgeable could indicate on the World Map
areas showing what parts of the globe are likely very dangerous and what less
dangerous. In other words, with global coming catastrophe would be needed to
relocate huge amounts of people into safe areas, perhaps on higher elevation.
However, this idea of saving as much people as possible, is under recent
geo-political situation inspired by Malthusian ideas, out of question. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eternal
fight for Survival. Here
are the two possible variants for "bad guys" and "good
guys" outcomes: A)
"They" will keep all the information and advantages just for
themselves and only for their benefits. With accumulated finances and
suppressed, but advanced technology, they intend to survive possible
catastrophes in some new Ark, likely above our planet. What happens with the
rest of population on our planet is irrelevant for them. B)
"They" will keep all the information for themselves just in order
to prevent wide spread panic. However, in the background, they will work hard
to apply collectively and without suspicion all necessary provisions needed
(what will baffle us as logically unexplainable activities) to benefit the
whole humanity as much as possible. However, since we are humans, there is a
real possibility that one of us (one nation) would manipulate proceeding such
a way, to gain more benefits than the rest. There
is no doubt that the ancient left us a great amount of precise astronomical
records and long stories about events following human development. With all
this stuff, plus geological evidence it is possible to develop a table of
cyclical catastrophes. The only one problem is correct dating. Similar table
of gigantic cataclysm is list of "geological times", periods of global
floods, volcanic activity and movements of tectonic plates. Dimensions of
these events exceed human imagination. Periods between cataclysm have just
"small" geological and climatic changes. It is true, that energy
potential of the Earth itself is not enough to trigger even the smaller
changes, so there must be influence from "outside". Before
somebody will object that this as impossible, he/she should humbly realize
that humans are NOT the peak of cosmic creation, but only its random part the
same way as a flower or some kind of fungus. The Universe does not work
according to theories our science develops. What we know about it, are just
poor fractions of the whole. More or less recently, our
"sunscientists" were forced by the Universe to throw away long time
cherished model of solar polarity, including tables for calculating length of
certain periods, strength of solar activity and number of sunspots. According
to science, this solar period we live in right now should not exist; the Sun
is ignoring all the famous theories, and it does what it wants... That is
just a brief comment to what is "possible" and what is
"impossible". In
respect to the strength of cataclysmic processes on the borders of
"geological time", is possible to conclude, that if any higher
forms of life were living at that time, they could barely survive. For this
reason, these "times" are herein excluded; lets look only on the
last cataclysm. This last one was evidently survived by a small group of
humanoids, later transformed into recent humans with the help of
"gods" (and don't come to me with Darwin…). All
the informations we have available (including the unpublished), are
exclusively from this last catastrophe. First evidence is scarce, completeness
and density of historical records is increasing only around 3100BC. Here is
reasonable to conclude that this date is important braking point predated
very likely by some "small", but global catastrophe. This last
catastrophe is traceable in original sources, it is also reflected as Flood
in the Bible, with memories of the event present on all continents, and it is
even recognized scientifically as a starting point of human civilization. In
connection to this, I found work of British geneticist Bryan Sykes very
interesting ["The Seven Daughters of Eve"]. Suppose,
they did not survive by "accident", but thanks to involvement of
"gods" as indicated in the story of Ark. Logistic of the Ark is so
complex that such a project could not be realized by anyone, except some
powerful elite. It seems as natural that each elite group was also keeper of
knowledge before the catastrophe. Since this destruction came clearly from
the sky (astronomical reasons), this fact embedded deeply into the collective
memories of survivors and was passed to descendants. However, historical
experience of the last, relatively quiet 2000 years, demonstrates that
humanity is forgetting very easily. Soon every new generation adapted to new
conditions and except few individuals, no one cared to fully comprehend and
evaluate immense value of "flood stories" passed down for generations.
Many irreplaceable records were destroyed during wars in Egypt and
Mesopotamia, and probably the most valuable archives perished forever during
boundless, over 200 years lasting fury of illiterate hog stickers and
fanatical Christian in South America. What is left now, are just broken
crumbs distorted by views of collectors influenced by trends and conventions
of their time. It is interesting, that every revivalist and religious group
paid always the greatest attention to liquidate any sights and records of
previous ages. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indian
work from collection of Father Crespi. This
does NOT represent human figure; the artist emphasized it by four fingers on
legs and hands. It is like we would meet with South American version of
Egyptian goddess of heaven Nut, holding in hands her children - two objects…
On the right is Sun, on the left "dragon" Chameleon. It
is a bit difficult to see in both works connections, since they are not
representing what we call reality. It is representation of knowledge, which
at the time of creation of the works existed, only as legend, myth, or epos
from various tribes speaking in different languages and positioned at
different steps of development and with different concepts to comprehend
world around. For
deep thoughts is recommended to compare similarity of lower part of
Chilbolton image with lower part of "Weeping God" of Tihuanaco
(right). Just coincidence...? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On
the other picture, we see more or less the same. Expression is different, but
contents are undoubtedly identical. Relief from Dendera (left) is showing
symbolism used in semite-hamit cultural circle, so we encounter concepts for
"columns and gates of heaven", familiar from Henoch's description
of Heaven. These columns are in Nimrud Dag (right) substituted by massive legs
of a lion ending with four strange looking paws showing four digits. On the
lion's neck is sort of half-moon with a "star". With the same
symbols all over the lion's body, it is difficult to discount the fact that
the artist intent was to show heavenly bodies. The whole works shows
"lion of heaven" and the symbols on its neck and body is
introducing something important. Egyptians
rendered planets they knew as a barches, carrying particular gods. Here we
see a huge planetary bark not with gods, but with one spherical object. Like
on previous pictures, allegory here is showing prominent heavenly object
travelling not just between the columns, but also exceeding them. No need to
get confused by small faces on top of the columns, they are not traditional "heavenly
cows". --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The
"Prime Language" Presence
of some ancient global civilization is confirmed also by finds of rock art,
bearing similar symbols and language to some extent similar to proto hebrew.
These primary expressions are present on Indian pictograms, wrongly
considered for long time as symbols of sign language. There are many other
similar objects. The catch is, that no one spent time to trace their contours
to decipher them. Transcript is shown on picture at left. Perhaps
one of the most important evidence that legend of the Flood was known
globally is in the following, highly sophisticated writing. Following
generation of people living in China forgot this highly developed writing,
and returned to more simple "pictures". However, some of the recent
Chinese writing still carries reflections of the highly |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||||
