|
|
Newsgroup
posting position the of Planet-X
(This
again is a long article-please feel free to download or copy)
To All,
Here is some of the latest info regarding Planet X as follows:
"Planet X is 9.012 Sun-Pluto distances away as of May 7, 2001. It
outweighs the Earth by some 23 times, but by size is not 23 times as large as
its weight is due to its makeup, having less silicon than the Earth, for
instance. Should one line these planets up side by side, the Earth
would look to Planet X as the Moon does to the Earth. ... In the tug of war
regarding magnetic alignment, the 12th Planet's mass gives it a 4-to-1
advantage. There is no contest."
"The problem is that the normal eye, even when scanning a photo, would
miss it as it is a faint blurr, rather than the pin-point expected. Infrared
works well, but requires equipment in the hands of few. Red filtering,
aggressive red filtering, will bring it to the fore more than anything."
"Your hope for an early brightness will not be met, as the 12th is too
far away for reflected sunlight up until 6 months before its passage.
Likewise, it does not grow in size to where it is obvious that it is not a
fading nova at a great distance until it begins to reflect sunlight. Thus, up
until these last few months, the excuse that this is a faded nova of sorts
will be put forth, and even supported by doctored images."
"It was known that at this time, approximately Feb 1, 2001, Planet X
would be visible without question to an observatory." "Although the 12th Planet at present
is a magnitude 2.0, astronomers should include objects up to a magnitude 10
in their image capture. The image capture results should be passed through a
red filter, as most equipment is calibrated to locate the pinpoint brightness
of stars, rather than a diffuse glow. The naked eye i.e. not a computer will
begin to register increased brightness approximately 1 year 7 months before
the cataclysms start, or late in the year 2001."
"The comet will be visible to the unaided eye for approximately 7.3
weeks, certainly no less than 43 days,
prior to the Earth's pole shift. ... During the last few weeks, back yard
astronomers will be able to detect motion of the comet across the skies,
something a distant star would not do."
"A Nova would not move, and if this is claimed to be a comet by the
government, it won’t move according to the ephemeris. The path of this
inbound planet is given below for those who want to attempt to track it:
RA 5.138421 Dec 16.419789 on April 30, 2001
RA 5.143675 Dec 16.421739 on April 15, 2001
RA 5.151245 Dec 16.55743 on April 1, 2001
RA 5.16549 Dec 16.55847 on March 17, 2001
RA 5.16653 Dec 16.56912 on March 1, 2001
RA 5.16659 Dec 16.57897 on February 22, 2001
RA 5.16784 Dec 16.57943 on February 15, 2001
The 12th Planet [Planet X] will appear to linger at the point where it turns
to assume a retrograde orbit, spending a two year period in this portion of
the path alone, anticipated to be at:
RA 4.29741 Dec 9.96621 on March 3, 2003
RA 5.47 Dec 19.54 on September 1, 2000
RA 6.23 Dec 24.12 on May 1, 2000
RA 6.24 Dec 23.45 on January 1, 2000
RA 6.32 Dec 21.57 on January 1, 1999
RA 6.24 Dec 19.16 on December 1, 1997
"Astronomy
Search for the Tenth Planet
Dec 1981
Astronomers are readying telescopes
to probe the outer reaches of our solar system for an elusive planet much
larger than Earth. Its existence would explain a 160-year-old
mystery. ... The pull exerted by its gravity would account for a wobble in
Uranus' orbit that was first detected in 1821 by a French astronomer, Alexis Bouvard. Beyond Pluto,
in the cold, dark regions of space,
may lie an undiscovered tenth planet two to five times the size of Earth.
Astronomers at the U.S. Naval Observatory
(USNO) are using a powerful computer to identify the best target zones, and a
telescopic search will follow soon after. ... Van Flandern thinks the tenth
planet may have between two and five Earth masses and lie 50 to 100
astronomical units from the Sun. (An astronomical unit is the mean distance
between Earth and
the Sun.) His team also presumes that, like Pluto's, the plane of the
undiscovered body's orbit is tilted with respect to that of most other
planets, and that its path around the Sun is highly elliptical.
Astronomy
Searching for a 10th Planet
Oct 1982
The hunt for new worlds hasn't ended. Both Uranus and Neptune follow
irregular paths that observers can explain only by assuming the presence of an
unknown body whose gravity tugs at the two planets. Astronomers originally
though Pluto might be the body perturbing its neighbors, but the combined
mass of Pluto and its moon, Charon, is too small for such a role. ... While
astronomers believe that something is out there, they aren't
sure what it is. Three possibilities stand out: First, the object could
be a planet - but any world large and close enough to affect the orbits
of Uranus and Neptune should already
have been spotted. Searchers might have missed the planet, though, if
it's unusually dark or has an odd orbit. ...
NASA has been recording velocities for a year now
and will continue for as long as necessary. This past spring, it appeared
that budget cuts might force the end of the Pioneer project. The space agency
now believes that it will have the money to continue mission operations. Next
year, the JPL group will begin analyzing the data. By the time the Pioneer
experiment shows results, an Earth-orbiting infrared telescope may have discovered
the body. ... Together, IRAS and the Pioneers will allow astronomers to mount
a comprehensive search for new solar system members. The two deep space
probes should detect bodies near enough to disturb their trajectories and the
orbits or Uranus and Neptune. IRAS
should detect any large body in or near the solar system. Within the next year or two, astronomers
may discover not oe new world, but several."+
"New York Times
June 19, 1982
A pair of American spacecraft may help scientists detect what could be a 10th planet or a giant
object billions of miles away, the
national Aeronautics and Space Administration said Thursday. Scientists at
the space agency's Ames Research Center said the two spacecraft, Pioneer 10
and 11, which are already farther into space than any other man-made object,
might add to knowledge of a mysterious object believed to be beyond the solar
system's outermost known planets. The space agency said that persistent
irregularities in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune "suggest some kind of
mystery object is really there" with its distance depending on what it
is. If the mystery object is a new planet, it may lie five billion miles
beyond the outer orbital ring of known planets, the space agency said. If it
is a dark star type of objet, it may be 50 billion miles beyond the known
planets; if it is a black hole, 100 billion miles. A black hole is a
hypothetical body in space, believed to be a collapsed star so condensed that
neither light nor matter can escape from its gravitational field.
Newsweek
Does the Sun Have a Dark Companion?
June 28 1982
When scientists noticed that Uranus wasn't following its predicted orbit for
example, they didn't question their theories. Instead they blamed the anomalies
on an as yet unseen planet and, sure enough, Neptune was discovered in 1846.
Now astronomers are using the same strategy to explain quirks in the orbits
of Uranus and Neptune. According to John Anderson of the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., this
odd behavior suggests that the sun has an unseen companion, a dark star
gravitationally bound to it but
billions of miles away. ... Other scientists suggest that the most likely cause of the orbital
snags is a tenth planet 4 to 7 billion miles beyond Neptune. A companion star
would tug the outer planets, not just Uranus and Neptune, says Thomas Van
Flandern of the U.S Naval
Observatory. And where he admits a tenth planet is possible, but argues that it would have to
be so big - a least the size of Uranus - that it should have been discovered
by now. To resolve the question, NASA
is staying tuned to Pioneer 10 and
11, the planetary probes that are flying through the dim reaches of the solar
system on opposite sides of the sun."
"New York Times
January 30, 1983
Something out there beyond the farthest reaches of the known solar system
seems to be tugging at Uranus and Neptune. Some gravitational force keeps
perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities in their orbits. The
force suggests a presence far away and unseen, a large object that may be the
long- sought Planet X. ... The last time a serious search of the skies was
made it led to the discovery in 1930 of Pluto, the ninth planet. But the
story begins more than a century before that, after the discovery of Uranus
in 1781 by the English astronomer and musician William Herschel. Until then,
the planetary system seemed to end with Saturn. As astronomers observed Uranus, noting irregularities in its
orbital path, many speculated that they were witnessing the gravitational
pull of an unknown planet. So began the first planetary search based on
astronomers predictions, which ended in the 1840's with the discovery of
Neptune almost simultaneously by English, French, and German astronomers. But
Neptune was not massive enough to account entirely for the orbital behavior
of Uranus. Indeed, Neptune itself seemed to be affected by a still more
remote planet. In the last 19th century, two American astronomers, Willian H.
Pickering and Percival Lowell, predicted the size and approximate location of
the trans-Neptunian body, which Lowell called Planet X. Years later, Pluto
was detected by Clyde W. Tombaugh working at Lowell Observatory in Arizona.
Several astronomers, however, suspected it might not be the Planet X of
prediction. Subsequent observation proved them right. Pluto was too small to
change the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, the combined mass of Pluto and its
recently discovered satellite, Charon, is only 1/5 that of Earth's moon. Recent calculations by the United States
Naval Observatory have confirmed the orbital perturbation exhibited by Uranus
and Neptune, which Dr. Thomas C Van Flandern, an astronomer at the
observatory, says could be explained by "a single undiscovered planet".
He and a colleague, Dr. Richard Harrington, calculate that the 10th planet
should be two to five times more massive than Earth and have a highly
elliptical orbit that takes it some 5 billion miles beyond that of Pluto -
hardly next-door but still within the gravitational influence of the Sun.
..."
"Washington Post
Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered, a front page story
31-Dec-1983
A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so
close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found in
the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the
U.S. infrared astronomical satellite. So mysterious is the object that
astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar"
that never got hot enough to become a star,
a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of
forming its first stars or a galaxy
so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets
through. "All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is," Dr.
Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief scientist for California's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory and
director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Institute of
Technology said in an interview. The
most fascinating explanation of this mystery body, which is so cold it casts
no light and has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space,
is that it is a giant gaseous planet, as large as Jupiter and as close to
Earth as 50 billion miles. While that may seem like a great distance in
earthbound terms, it is a stone's throw in cosmological terms, so close in
fact that it would be the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the outermost
planet Pluto. "If it is really that close, it would be a part of our
solar system," said Dr. James Houck of Cornell University's Center for
Radio Physics and Space Research and a member of the IRAS science team.
"If it is that close, I don't know how the world's planetary scientists
would even begin to classify it."
The mystery body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it
scanned the northern sky from last January to November, when the satellite
ran out of the supercold helium that allowed its
telescope to see the coldest bodies in the heavens. The second
observation took place six months after the first and suggested the mystery
body had not moved from its spot in the sky near the western edge of the
constellation Orion in that time. "This suggests it's not a comet
because a comet would not be as large as the one we've observed and a comet
would probably have moved," Houck said. "A planet may have moved if
it were as close as 50 billion miles but it could still be a more distant
planet and not have moved in six months time.
US News World Report
Planet X - Is It Really Out There?
Sept 10, 1984
Shrouded from the sun's light, mysteriously tugging at the orbits of Uranus
and Neptune, is an unseen force that astronomers suspect may be Planet X - a
10th resident of the Earth's celestial neighborhood. Last year, the infrared
astronomical satellite (IRAS), circling in a polar orbit 560 miles from the
Earth, detected heat from an object about 50 billion miles away that is now
the subject of intense speculation. "All I can say is that we don't know
what it is yet," says Gerry Neugesbeuer, director of the Palomar
Observatory for the California Institute of Technology.
Scientists are hopeful that the one-way journeys of the Pioneer 10 and 11
space probes may help to locate the nameless body."
"ON FEB 7, 2001: Neuchatal
[The] whole team is contacting all and every observatories in France -
just sent a message. The Neuchatel observatory got it. They are very excited,
wondering if it is a comet or a brown dwarf, through the latest coordinates
you gave. I'm going to ask for further details. The daughter of the
astronomer reports that they suspect a comet or a brown dwarf on the process
to become a pulsar since it emits "waves"." NASA wants to be
able to get the heck off Earth and onto Mars by very early 2003; Bob Dole
felt it was imperative that Star Wars be in operations BY 2003, but the
establishment won’t tell you WHY this is because they :
1. can’t do anything about it, and
2. don’t want your messy panic, and
3. can’t feed and care for you then, but
4. want you to keep paying your taxes anyway.
Meanwhile, you’re in the dark. After the first Feb 7, 2001 sighting, it
was predicted that an “alternate explanation” of what was being sighted would
be forthcoming from the establishment. Meanwhile,
they stall. Here's a recent experience of someone wanting to sight at
the coordinates from a publically-available observatory. “I called the observatory around 7:30 and
spoke to some guy and asked
if it was okay to look at an object near the constellation Orion. He said
that there was some large pipe that had been placed in front of the
observatory and was not sure if he could swing the telescope in
that direction but that we might be able to see something. He recommended
coming around 8:30. When we made it there he seemed helpful until he asked
what I was looking for and I said possibly a comet. I told him I had exact
coordinates and that it would be about magnitude 11, diffuse and a red filter
would be helpful. He said optimal time to look would be about 9:30. There was
also a full moon tonight but it was not up yet. We hung around outside for about 1/2 hr looking through some
telescopes that some amateurs were viewing with and headed back into the
observatory to make sure this guy did not forget about us. From that time on
he completely ignored or avoided us and hung out outside mostly. Nothing too
off kilter yet. "
"Finally it's 10:00 and I go outside and ask him when he can move the
telescope. He then off-handily replies that Orion has gone below the horizon
and we wouldn't be able to see anything anymore. I said even Dec 16? which he replied that we may be able
to see that high. When we went back inside to put the coordinates on the
computer his behavior became hat I would describe as markedly disturbed. When
I read him the coordinates (it was fairly dark inside) he entered the first
in wrong, and after I corrected him only entered into three decimal places
and rounded up when he should have rounded down. He remarked that the
other decimal places were not
necessary. I didn't persist because I felt it
would be in the ball park. He then moved the telescope, went over to the eye
piece (it was so fast I wasn't even sure he looked), came back, muttered
something about trees, moons, horizons or something, entered in new
coordinates, moved the telescope and left to the other side and began talking
to some other people before I could even say a word. I was quite perplexed
and wasn't sure what had happened but I wasn't going to give up." "I approached him again and asked him
if he looked at those coordinates. He
said he had, nothing there and tried to brush me off. I asked him if he could
move it back so I could take a look. He then brought out some big star chart
book, opened it up, pointed to the very bottom of the map on the page and
said it was very low. I then persisted if that was the right area and he then
changed and pointed to near the top of the map. I said we should be able to
see it then no problem and again directly asked if he could move it to those
coordinates so I could take a quick
look. It was like he was speechless, looking around blankly, brought out
another book, opened it, started babbling about nothing until I stopped him
and told him that we've been waiting two hours and could we please take a
look. He then re-enters the coordinates which I read off again and moved the
telescope. I go to take a look."
"Near the center I see nothing that I think looks like the 12th
[aka
Planet X] (just a couple stars) but at the very top right corner if I moved
my head I could see what appeared to be a darkish, diffuse, round spot,
fairly large (I also got him to hand me a red filter but was then not able to
see even the brightest objects in my view). I asked him if that darkish spot
was anything or just an optical flaw and he said it was optical (we were
viewing Saturn earlier and I did not recall seeing any dark spot and I
thought it was strange to have such a large flaw on the eyepiece of a
$200,000 piece of equipment). He then handed my friend a hand held controller
that had about six dials or buttons on it and said he could move the
telescope around and walked away - no instructions. My friend looked at me
like "what the hell am I supposed to do with this?". I looked
through several times and the spot was definitely discernible. I then approached
the guy, thanked him for his time and gave him a friendly pat on the arm. He
did not even respond or look up at me. When we left I asked my friend if it
was just me or if that guy was acting very strange. My friend felt that he
was acting very
strange and at the very least definitely not trying to help us."
"The Explanation: This is an example
of what the persistent public can expect when looking for the 12th [aka
Planet X] in an observatory where someone has been told to "stall".
You must admit, he did his best. How many blocks did he throw in your way?
How many times did he point you in the wrong direction? How many times did he
try to discourage you by failing to help? Add all this up, and it is a couple
dozen, all told, as there was foot
dragging you did not even type up here, as your point was made. Now why would
an individual do this, unless under orders.
In the context of an individual looking for his paycheck to continue, and his boss to consider him a team
player, and his chances of promotion or recommendations for other jobs he may
have ambitions to get - this behavior is not that unusual. If some lackey
were told to keep George from making it to where a female star is to emerge
from her dressing room, he would direct George to the wrong hotel, or floor,
state that she had already left, and if not prone to violence do everything
he could to deflect George in this manner. Is that her? No, a look-alike
drawing the crowd away. What car is she to drive off in? The one which is the
wrong color, parked in the wrong place, and don't ask me any more questions
as I've suddenly gotten busy on the phone.
Not all observatories will be like this, and note you saw the 12th, in
spite of it all. Our emissary was not able to respond to your e-mail asking
for updated coordinates in time, but this is the right approach to take.
Strength in numbers, and when this type of stalling no longer works, they will come out with an alternative
explanation for what you are seeing. Anticipate this, shortly.
"
Planet X/Nibiru/Wormwood/Marduk/(Sitchin's) 12th Planet takes a long
eliptical orbit between between the Sun and its dead twin that is akin to a
train running back and forth on a track, NOT the big swing out that our
experts predict would be the case." "It comes though our solar
system every 3,657 years, and is the same traveling planet the ancient
Sumerians were aware of (see Sitchin’s books). It causes pole shifts when it
comes close to the Earth during these passages, a sliding core and crust that
has evidence in our wandering poles, flash frozen mastodons, mountain
building, whale bones on
mountain tops, and continental “drift”." "The approaching pole
shift in 2003 is why we have more active volcanoes than in the memory of man,
why quake frequency and size are increasing, why the weather has gone beserk,
and why we are experiencing magnetic diffusion. It’s not sun spots, an
11 year cycle which somehow has been pushed to 2003 by the establishement to
become a 14 year cycle. It’s not global warming, as the earth is
heating up from the core UP, and since heat rises, how did warm air cause the
deep ocean rift increase to become HIGHER than the surface increase?"
"The predicted 1995 food shortages we are experiencing now."
"The predicted Domino or Richochet Quakes have now emerged, after the
Turkey quake in 1999." "They called it a nova when it was first
sighted and supposedly outgassing beyond where a comet would outgas.
They said this long before the ESO stated that the supposed Hale Bopp comet
was not giving out any comet emissions. Humm. Note this convenient nova
was in the opposite direction of Orion, where the establishment does NOT want
you to peer. Then they warned that the establishment was connecting the dots
in the sky to line this dying nova up with a real comet sighting by the NEAT
program. This effort caused JPL to have Hale Bopp perturbing away from
Jupiter when it passes. Humm. Then this mysterious Hale-Bopp comet, now
a real comet, miraculously began outgassing again. Meanwhile, almost all
Hubble pictures of Hale-Bopp were kept from the public. Humm. 13 months of no
pictures."
"Regardless of WHERE the information comes from, there is SOMETHING out
there at the coordinates given. The last time there was a debate, I was
challenged to provide proof. Where was this inbound planet - Planet X r
the 12th Planet or whatever called? Now it's visible by bservatories.
do you think a woman who can't handle math and doesn't even know what end of
a scope to look into if she owned one could just come up with these
coordinates, which are MOVING? To the 5th and 6th decimal place?
Pretty good toss of the dart at the board, I'd say. Perhaps I'm a government
agent, tasked with putting out a message that could cause panic in such as
way that it is deniable. A casual comment by NASA, along with a Hubble
image, that the planet will be in deep doo-doo in 2003 and there's is nothing
the powers that be can do about is something they would hesitate to do. So
what is it, folks are seeing, at those coordinates? If it's a comet,
then please compute the ephemeris and we'll see if it moves according
to that or what they have stated will be the path. Should be
interesting. If a brown dwarf, then it's really close as it is MOVING, not
tationary. hould be even more interesting. Re what they say is the
distance:
The 12th Planet is circling on a long elliptical
orbit around the sun and its dead companion which lies at
a distance some 18.724 times the length from the sun to Pluto. It is not a
long distance to be traveled in
3,657 years, especially considering that it transverses the solar system in 3
short months! Clearly, the uptick in speed is considerable, and the rate of
speed as it floats from one binary sun to the other is sedate in comparison.
Thus, when the passage is due in 2003, there is an exponential increase in
speed during the last years, and this speeding up has already started. To
compute the distance from the solar system on any given date, create an
exponential equation which takes into consideration the total distance we
have given for the sun's dead companion, the years the 12th Planet takes to
make a complete ellipse (3,657), and the approximate May 15, 2003 date of the
next passage. The distance will differ greatly, thus, depending upon the
date."
"Beyond the way equipment is calibrated, they have also stated that our
expectations are a problem, in that we are scanning for something
bright." "[It] appears as large as a star as viewed by the
naked eye. It does not shine with the intensity of most stars, but has a dull, diffuse, glow. It appears to be the
last gasp of a dying star, a faint, blurry, reddish glow. Your eye would pass
over it if attuned to the pin points that are the stars. A star is intense in
the center and rapidly diminishes in intensity toward the edges of the spot
you call a star. The light from a star comes from a single point and fans
out, the periphery a bit less than the center, increasingly, but the center
very intense. The 12th Planet, being nearer, is giving you light rays from
its entire surface, so the light has an even quality to it. Its distance
cannot be measured, but one will notice that as time passes, no other object
passes before it.
Your nearby planets are throwing back at you a familiar light, reflected
sunlight, and thus your eyes recognize them for what they are. Just as some
insects camouflage themselves from those who would prey on them by adopting
the coloration of the surrounding area, just so the 12th Planet, to you, is
camouflaged against the night sky. Its appearance does not look like the
familiar objects you set out to identify when you scan the sky - pin points
with intense centers that are stars or the scattered brilliance of an
exploding star or the distinctive elongated fantail of a passing comet. Where
its size at present is akin to a star, and the diffuse light across its
surface would indeed have the spread and consistency that your reflecting
planets do, there are significant differences that cause you to pass over it
rather than explore it in depth.
1. the composition is not the
composition of reflecting
sunlight, but is almost exclusively in the
spectrum
you would call red light. Thus you will do best
if
you filter for red light, and by this we mean
filtering
out all but red light.
2. though a large planet, 4 times as large as Earth and
thus larger than Mars or Pluto, it is at this
time at a
much greater distance and thus its visibility is
not
equivalent to Mars or Pluto."
Jason Martell
Xfacts.com
|
|
